![]() > rate, ambient temperature, etc) than about navigation/routing. > devices tend to be more about logging what you're doing (crank rate, heart > that donate button to help flesh out our armada.) The FIT class of > have a large number of yacht-class GPSes to tinker with. > notorious for not playing well with other programs and it's not like we > as a runner or on your handlebars as a cyclist. > generally associated with fitness devices - more devices worn on your wrist > I'm a little surprised that you have marine units requiring FIT as they're > To the letter of your question: we've supported GPX since its inception > typically need to be reduced, but I imagine you already do that in another > complicated than just transcribing gpx to fit, as the number of points > long time, so maybe I should just try it:-) However, it is a little more > read capability and nothing for route write. The devices I'm trying to load fit routes onto are a 920XT and GPSMAP > Sorry, the boat environment is only relevant to the lack of internet for Those letters matter and a 96S may be a completely different beast. In the Garmin protocol doc of that era that the 96 acted like others. I see it's included in our list, but that's probably from some promise Your part is in order as I can't evidence that anyone's tried the 96/96C atĪll. You are indeed far enough off the beaten path that some experimentation on Pages that explain simplification include: We do indeed have filters for simplifying routes and tracks. Plug it in, try it as a Garmin protocol device. If it doesn't show up like a USB drive when you Since you're the one most familiar with that device, some experimentation ![]() They'll really only work if they're really similar on the Honestly, the 96 models are soĮsoteric to us that you may be the first to try it in the 15 years since Routes to them over USB or maybe serial using their Windows driver and Units and probably predate Garmin's embrace of GPX. I don't even see a 96S from Garmin, but the 96/96C are 15 year old aviation We indeed don't write routes to FITįor exactly the reason I described most people want their data off theĭevice and don't use them for navigation. > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: So, is there any chance you could add fit > GPSBable seems to be the logical place to have such functionality since > remote islands, to say nothing of being expensive. > online and that is impossible for me in the middle of the ocean or at many I've searched high and low on the net for I have a couple of Garmin devices and need to convert gpx files to > I'm in New Zealand now, but from Hawaii and cruise the Pacific Islands on > Sorry if this is a repeat, but I'm new here and don't know how to do a ![]() Sail on and next time you go boating in either HI or NZ, please be sure we If not, please describe in moreĭetail what you've actually tried, what didn't work, sample files, etc. So I'll admit I'm a bit baffled by the combination you're trying toĭescribe, but I think we have the pieces. Rate, ambient temperature, etc) than about navigation/routing. That donate button to help flesh out our armada.) The FIT class ofĭevices tend to be more about logging what you're doing (crank rate, heart Have a large number of yacht-class GPSes to tinker with. Notorious for not playing well with other programs and it's not like we Generally associated with fitness devices - more devices worn on your wristĪs a runner or on your handlebars as a cyclist. I'm a little surprised that you have marine units requiring FIT as they're To the letter of your question: we've supported GPX since its inception and
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |